We should do more of these.

It's depressing to see how inactive it has been recently. I mean, everybody is pretty much primarily posting in the never ending thread now and there's not enough people here to make this place really booming. We need to find some way to bring more people here before this place just fades into nothingness...

I know for a fact that a lot of boards out there are thriving because of how many people are there. We just need to get back into the game and pull people here. However, where we obtain these people might matter, because we don't to end up pulling in douches like those at Selkath.

I understand that people are busy these days, but it doesn't seem like they're rarely at their computer anymore. I know most of you are still dicking around with your computer. I don't know how we …

[ Full reading ]

Happy New Year OT! We may be dying... BUT WE'RE STILL HERE! We had an... interesting year last year. Vice Admin Burkman is taking a long earned vacation and Uly is stepping into his position. Well... I'd have more to say but I've got other things to do atm... and oh yeah... to quote Callin... "GET A MIC YA BUM!"

~Scott

Subject: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:34 pm

But instead of Pokemon, let's get something else. Ideas?

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:35 pm

Star wars characters.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:35 pm

Characters from classic Cartoon Network shows? We should do more of these. 928233731

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:36 pm

Bulbasaur wrote:: Characters from classic Cartoon Network shows?

I call Johny Bravo.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:36 pm

Grovyle wrote:: Star wars characters.

It could be my chance to return as a Jawa.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:37 pm

Bulbasaur wrote:: Characters from classic Cartoon Network shows?

Spongebob, BITCH!

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:37 pm

Grovyle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:: Characters from classic Cartoon Network shows?

I call Johny Bravo.

I call Ed. :ed edd n eddy:

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:37 pm

I'm going with Double D.

Not the one from Ed Edd n Eddy though.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:38 pm

Arceus wrote:: I'm going with Double D.

Not the one from Ed Edd n Eddy though.

:ed edd n eddy:

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:39 pm

Arceus wrote:: I'm going with Double D.

Not the one from Ed Edd n Eddy though.

We should do more of these. 42493d1253929502-took-pic-lady-walmart-earlier-what-you-did-there-i-see-

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:39 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Arceus wrote:: I'm going with Double D.

Not the one from Ed Edd n Eddy though.

:ed edd n eddy:

Boobs, stupid. We should do gigantic boob day.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:42 pm

Arceus wrote:: Boobs, stupid. We should do gigantic boob day.

Wabafet!

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:43 pm

Arceus wrote:

Squirtle wrote:

Arceus wrote:: I'm going with Double D.

Not the one from Ed Edd n Eddy though.

:ed edd n eddy:

Boobs, stupid. We should do gigantic boob day.

I kind of figured that out, dumbass.

And if we're doing a gigantic boob day, I call being Boba's, AND Wilbourn's.

At the same time, yes.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:45 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Arceus wrote:

Squirtle wrote:: :ed edd n eddy:

Boobs, stupid. We should do gigantic boob day.

I kind of figured that out, dumbass.

And if we're doing a gigantic boob day, I call being Boba's, AND Wilbourn's.

At the same time, yes.

Bulba-bulba-bulbasaur!

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:47 pm

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:

Arceus wrote:: Boobs, stupid. We should do gigantic boob day.

I kind of figured that out, dumbass.

And if we're doing a gigantic boob day, I call being Boba's, AND Wilbourn's.

At the same time, yes.

Bulba-bulba-bulbasaur!

I've been thinking about this for a while...

You know how Bulbasaur has that little plant/leafish thing on his back? If he got hit with fire, wouldn't it burn off?

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:51 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:: I kind of figured that out, dumbass.

And if we're doing a gigantic boob day, I call being Boba's, AND Wilbourn's.

At the same time, yes.

Bulba-bulba-bulbasaur!

I've been thinking about this for a while...

You know how Bulbasaur has that little plant/leafish thing on his back? If he got hit with fire, wouldn't it burn off?

It's filled with intumescents

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:53 pm

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:: Bulba-bulba-bulbasaur!

I've been thinking about this for a while...

You know how Bulbasaur has that little plant/leafish thing on his back? If he got hit with fire, wouldn't it burn off?

It's filled with intumescents

o rly??? h0w can u be so sur3z??

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:56 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:: I've been thinking about this for a while...

You know how Bulbasaur has that little plant/leafish thing on his back? If he got hit with fire, wouldn't it burn off?

It's filled with intumescents

o rly??? h0w can u be so sur3z??

BECUZ I IS BULBASAUR!!!! We should do more of these. Spr_3f_001

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:58 pm

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:: It's filled with intumescents

o rly??? h0w can u be so sur3z??

BECUZ I IS BULBASAUR!!!! We should do more of these. Spr_3f_001

Bowls. Spoons.

Bowls are spoons.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 4:59 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:: o rly??? h0w can u be so sur3z??

BECUZ I IS BULBASAUR!!!! We should do more of these. Spr_3f_001

Bowls. Spoons.

Bowls are spoons.

But can spoons be bowls if the bowl already has a bowl filled with spoons?

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 5:00 pm

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:: BECUZ I IS BULBASAUR!!!!

Bowls. Spoons.

Bowls are spoons.

But can spoons be bowls if the bowl already has a bowl filled with spoons?

Because bowls are full of themselves.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 5:01 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:: Bowls. Spoons.

Bowls are spoons.

But can spoons be bowls if the bowl already has a bowl filled with spoons?

Because bowls are full of themselves.

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 5:03 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:: Bowls. Spoons.

Bowls are spoons.

But can spoons be bowls if the bowl already has a bowl filled with spoons?

Because bowls are full of themselves.

We should do more of these. Cfdd2accc1188f5fbc62e149074c7f29

FFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU---

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 5:05 pm

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:: But can spoons be bowls if the bowl already has a bowl filled with spoons?

Because bowls are full of themselves.

FFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU---

:stormtrooper:

no...just no

Subject: Re: We should do more of these. Mon May 30, 2011 5:07 pm

Squirtle wrote:

Bulbasaur wrote:

Squirtle wrote:: Because bowls are full of themselves.

FFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU---

:stormtrooper:

no...just no