1988th One to Post Wins: The Killing Joke! (998th person to post in second thread)

Scott, just to mention: the comics in my post actually had sources which quote the politicians.
They want to do those things. And that is why the republican candidates are complete crap.

Better to stick with Obama untill a Bush-like-failure doesn't crop up.

Daroska wrote:

Scott, just to mention: the comics in my post actually had sources which quote the politicians.
They want to do those things. And that is why the republican candidates are complete crap.

Better to stick with Obama untill a Bush-like-failure doesn't crop up.

Good to have an outsider's point of view, Daroska. Just.... do more research.
I don't think that any republican canidate in office will lead to the same result: "crap", it might be similar. But don't generalize.

Daroska wrote:

Scott, just to mention: the comics in my post actually had sources which quote the politicians.
They want to do those things. And that is why the republican candidates are complete crap.

Better to stick with Obama untill a Bush-like-failure doesn't crop up.

Your comics quote them just as much as mine do (it's called referencing not quoting btw)... ;) Dar... you obviously don't actually watch American politics... half of these "quotes" are inferred... on both sides of the fence. Thank the media for that...

Again... I think I'm going to be doing a write in... as I'm not thrilled with ANY of the candidates. And I'm opposed to a lot of Obama's policies... Why the hell would I want him to stay in office?

The Mortonator wrote:

Scott wrote:

Again... I think I'm going to be doing a write in... as I'm not thrilled with ANY of the candidates. And I'm opposed to a lot of Obama's policies... Why the hell would I want him to stay in office?

I feel the same way. Who are you going to write in?

As of right now? Callin...

Callin wrote:

Scott wrote:

The Mortonator wrote:

Scott wrote:

Again... I think I'm going to be doing a write in... as I'm not thrilled with ANY of the candidates. And I'm opposed to a lot of Obama's policies... Why the hell would I want him to stay in office?

I feel the same way. Who are you going to write in?

As of right now? Callin...

Thanks for your Support but alas im too young to be President. other than that i meet all Constitutional Requirements. you gotta be 35 to run.

Psh... just a little edit on the birth certificate and we're good to go!

Causa wrote:

Daroska wrote:

Scott, just to mention: the comics in my post actually had sources which quote the politicians.
They want to do those things. And that is why the republican candidates are complete crap.

Better to stick with Obama untill a Bush-like-failure doesn't crop up.

Good to have an outsider's point of view, Daroska. Just.... do more research.
I don't think that any republican canidate in office will lead to the same result: "crap", it might be similar. But don't generalize.

Oh really Causa.. I hate when americans go and give foreigners this automatic kick away.
Ahem, I've done the research, valued my neutral opinion and came to a healthy conclusion.

'Crap' is the best and brightest summary of republicans in authority. Just complete, utter crap.
My parliament's idiotic groups couldn't even dare to match the bad apple that has consumed most republicans who dwell on power too long. They are revolting, sickening and I can't believe you guys actually vote these idiots in office.

Seriously- anyone with too strong on a subject shouldn't be a president, priminister or any leader. Opinionated leaders make dictators through the 'loudest voice' system where like sheep, people will follow the guy with the biggest piercing on their dick. It's as simple as that. But of course someone will disagree.

Otherwise I would be the one with the crusade banner on top of this here political debate.

Daroska wrote:

Causa wrote:

Daroska wrote:

Scott, just to mention: the comics in my post actually had sources which quote the politicians.
They want to do those things. And that is why the republican candidates are complete crap.

Better to stick with Obama untill a Bush-like-failure doesn't crop up.

Good to have an outsider's point of view, Daroska. Just.... do more research.
I don't think that any republican canidate in office will lead to the same result: "crap", it might be similar. But don't generalize.

Oh really Causa.. I hate when americans go and give foreigners this is automatic kick away.
Ahem, I've done the research, valued my neutral opinion and came to a healthy conclusion.

'Crap' is the best and brightest summary of republicans in authority. Just complete, utter crap.
My parliament's idiotic groups couldn't even dare to match the bad apple that has consumed most republicans who dwell on power too long. They are revolting, sickening and I can't believe you guys actually these vote these idiots in office.

Seriously- anyone with too strong on a subject shouldn't be a president, priminister or any leader. Opinionated leaders make dictators through the 'loudest voice' system where like sheep, people will follow the guy with the biggest piercing on their dick. It's as simple as that. But of course someone will disagree.

Otherwise I would be the one with the crusade banner on top of this here political debate.

You forgot the

Scott wrote:

Daroska wrote:

Causa wrote:

Good to have an outsider's point of view, Daroska. Just.... do more research.
I don't think that any republican canidate in office will lead to the same result: "crap", it might be similar. But don't generalize.

Oh really Causa.. I hate when americans go and give foreigners this is automatic kick away.
Ahem, I've done the research, valued my neutral opinion and came to a healthy conclusion.

'Crap' is the best and brightest summary of republicans in authority. Just complete, utter crap.
My parliament's idiotic groups couldn't even dare to match the bad apple that has consumed most republicans who dwell on power too long. They are revolting, sickening and I can't believe you guys actually these vote these idiots in office.

Seriously- anyone with too strong on a subject shouldn't be a president, priminister or any leader. Opinionated leaders make dictators through the 'loudest voice' system where like sheep, people will follow the guy with the biggest piercing on their dick. It's as simple as that. But of course someone will disagree.

Otherwise I would be the one with the crusade banner on top of this here political debate.

You forgot the

Why because I disagree with an obviously republican centralised forum's opinion?

It's good to stick a crossbow bolt through a corrupt american system's already gigantic ego.

Callin wrote:

i really wish i knew where i stood. Democrat.. Republican. i honestly dont know.

The majority of us are in the middle... we agree with different parts of different ideas on both sides of the fence. TBH we shouldn't even have parties... it's not how the country was set up.

Daroska wrote:

Scott wrote:

Daroska wrote:

Causa wrote:

Good to have an outsider's point of view, Daroska. Just.... do more research.
I don't think that any republican canidate in office will lead to the same result: "crap", it might be similar. But don't generalize.

Oh really Causa.. I hate when americans go and give foreigners this is automatic kick away.
Ahem, I've done the research, valued my neutral opinion and came to a healthy conclusion.

'Crap' is the best and brightest summary of republicans in authority. Just complete, utter crap.
My parliament's idiotic groups couldn't even dare to match the bad apple that has consumed most republicans who dwell on power too long. They are revolting, sickening and I can't believe you guys actually these vote these idiots in office.

Seriously- anyone with too strong on a subject shouldn't be a president, priminister or any leader. Opinionated leaders make dictators through the 'loudest voice' system where like sheep, people will follow the guy with the biggest piercing on their dick. It's as simple as that. But of course someone will disagree.

Otherwise I would be the one with the crusade banner on top of this here political debate.

You forgot the

Why because I disagree with an obviously republican centralised forum's opinion?

It's good to stick a crossbow bolt through a corrupt american system's already gigantic ego.

No this is a blatant attack on an incorrect american stereotype... nothing more.

Scott wrote:

Daroska wrote:

Scott wrote:

You forgot the

Why because I disagree with an obviously republican centralised forum's opinion?

It's good to stick a crossbow bolt through a corrupt american system's already gigantic ego.

No this is a blatant attack on an incorrect american stereotype... nothing more.

You've just proved it right by dictating an opinion and reinforcing it with your own power.

Pssh, americans. After we blew up the white house we should of drove them back into the atlantic.
Ahh.. I could be a tea tradesman making a deal with a native american casino owner right now.

Daroska wrote:

Scott wrote:

Daroska wrote:

Scott wrote:

You forgot the

Why because I disagree with an obviously republican centralised forum's opinion?

It's good to stick a crossbow bolt through a corrupt american system's already gigantic ego.

No this is a blatant attack on an incorrect american stereotype... nothing more.

You've just proved it right by dictating an opinion and reinforcing it with your own power.

Pssh, americans. After we blew up the white house we should of drove them back into the atlantic.
Ahh.. I could be a tea tradesman making a deal with a native american casino owner right now.

YOU were the one that started it by calling REPUBLICANS idiots... I disagreed. YOU further attacked the subject. YOU were the one who dictated an opinion and tried reinforcing it with your own power. Now you seem to be upset that no one agrees with you (or at least seems not to agree with you). I DON'T think all liberal ideals are bad. I DON'T think all conservative ideals are good. I disagree with what Obama is doing... that's MY opinion... and was called an IDIOT for not agreeing with YOU. These are ALL opinions... you can't label one correct or "idiotic".

In other news... it appears that Callin is the winner... >.>

Soooo... who's makin' the next one?

Callin wrote:

Scott wrote:

In other news... it appears that Callin is the winner... >.>

HUH? i just counted and i came up with BAN.

Wha... I just counted back 22 from my post before last... whatever... someone is our winner... for god's sake lets start a new L12PW now.